Cintra Wilson Calls Idea of Palin as VP an "Ideological Brain Rape," Compares to Playboy Bunny

Cintra Wilson Calls Idea of Palin as VP an "Ideological Brain Rape," Compares to Playboy Bunny

Cintra Wilson, injects every word of her article “Pissed About Palin” with bile, hellfire, and utter hatred, and you’ve got to give it to her, she can write. But Wilson is not quite being fair in her treatment of Sarah Palin. Despite the horror one might feel at the prospect of the Bridge to Nowhere-backing, creationist, provincial, new governor in the White House, Wilson mostly permits her anathema for the veep candidate to be expressed as a character attack pivoting on Palin’s appearance and the writer’s inference that Palin obtained her level of power only by spreading her legs.

 

She wrote on Salon.com:

As a woman who does not believe what Palin believes, the thought of such an opportunistic anti-female in the White House -- in the Cheney chair, no less -- is akin to ideological brain rape. What this Republican blowup doll does with her own insides in accord with her own faith is her business. But, like the worst and most terrifying of religious extremists, she seems very comfortable with the idea of imposing her own views on everyone else…


Sarah Palin and her virtual burqa have me and my friends retching into our handbags. She's such a power-mad, backwater beauty-pageant casualty, it's easy to write her off and make fun of her. But in reality I feel as horrified as a ghetto Jew watching the rise of National Socialism.


She is dangerous. She is not just pro-life, she's anti-life. She is the suppression of humanfeeling and instinct. She is a slave to the compromises dictated by her own desire for power and control. Sarah Palin is untethered from her own needs and those of her family, which is in crisis, with a pregnant daughter, a son on the way to Iraq and a special-needs infant.


She should, however, be a galvanizing point for women everywhere. Not to support her candidacy but to rebel against the Republican Party and take back the respect and equality so hard-earned by the women's liberation movement in the 1970s.


We've been shanghaied. This is sick. We need to slap the face of our bad frat-boy date and walk home from this drive-in movie. Sarah Palin may put out to be popular, but the rest of America's women don't need to do the same.


If not, what the hell? John McCain should go the whole Hugh Hefner route and have eight V.P.s that all look exactly like Sarah Palin.


It's McCain's world, girls: You'd just live in it.

Yes Palin is hyper-conservative, and no she has not supported women’s rights, especially insofar as abortion. But does Wilson comparing her to a blowup doll, calling her a “beauty-pageant casualty,” accusing her of “put[ting] out to be popular,” and likening her to a Playboy Bunny actually undermine the conservative ideology which has propped Palin up as a legitimate candidate, thinking that female Hillary Clinton supporters won’t differentiate between a horrifically reactionary female candidate and the liberal Clinton? Or is Wilson allowing her argument to assume the same misogynistic rhetorical vehicles of attack as the far Right?
 

Advertisement

Comments

Anonymous
I did not take her "putting out to be popular" statement as literally. I saw it as more of an analogy. Sarah Palin is selling out and sacrificing any sort of feminist idealogy in order to progress in the male political scene. The same way a girl would "put out" so more guys will like her Thats how I took it, but thats just me :) Posted 09/15/2008 7:17 PMReply
Anonymous
Sarah Palin is quite supportive of the rights of the women to be, were they not aborted. Don't call it women's rights. Call it abortion. Call a spade a spade. What infringes on one's rights more? Requiring a woman to give birth to a child she does not want or killing that child. One is an inconvenience and the other is death.

As far as what anonymous said, Sarah Palin isn't selling out. She is living her life by her own beliefs, which don't happen to coincide with the current left-wing feminist ideology. So much for letting people think for themselves. If you don't think as I do, you're wrong, I guess. And any further debate is unnecessary.

Show at least a modicum of modesty and entertain the possibility that there are viewpoints other than your own. Not everyone buys into the angry, over-the-top rhetoric spewed by organizations like NOW.
Posted 10/04/2008 01:18 AMReply
Anonymous
Well, Anonymous, if that's your REAL name, I'm going to guess you're a guy, and thus will never have to worry about the 'inconvenience' of being pregnant. An inconvenience that lasts from 9 months to life, and has been known to be fatal.

Was it Gloria Steinem who said that "if men could become pregnant, abortion would just be something to do once a month"?
Posted 10/15/2008 2:42 PMReply

Leave a comment


Please enter the text you see below or login to post with a username.